Post Reply 

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Obama Compares Gulf Oil Spill To 9/11 Tragedy
06-14-2010, 05:47 PM
Post: #1
Obama Compares Gulf Oil Spill To 9/11 Tragedy
[Image: obamathad.jpg]Our current Dictator in Chief and his cronies will certainly play the “crisis” fiddle for all it’s worth.

In an interview with Politico News outlet last Friday President Obama compared the recent incident in the Gulf of Mexico to the tragic 9/11 attack of 2001. With the stern conviction of a “world government” advocate, President Obama stated

“In the same way that our view of our vulnerabilities and our foreign policy was shaped profoundly by 9/11, I think this disaster is going to shape how we think about the environment and energy for many years to come.”

Or so he and many others advocating for Climate Change legislation hope. It seems that the words of Rahm Immanuel are once again in vogue with the administration, as we see an opportunity for our UN -loyal leaders to use this “crisis” to push for a Climate Change Bill in the Senate. And just in case you forgot the classic words of Rahm Immanuel during the economic crisis recently, here is what he said:

“Never let a serious crisis go to waste.. What I mean by that is, it’s a good opportunity to do things you couldn’t do before”.

Now whether or not you believe the oil spill in the Gulf was due to negligence, or as some speculate, a contrive event -one thing is clear- and that is our current Dictator in Chief and his cronies will certainly play the “crisis” fiddle for all it’s worth.

In the aftermath of 9/11, George Bush signed the Patriot Act into law under the pretense of protecting America against terrorism, and it looks as though Obama is playing the same Problem -Reaction -Solution game in this case as well. Why else would the cleanup efforts be taking so long? Why does the daily news agencies remind us constantly of the number of days it’s been since the accident first happened? And why has the White House along with BP rejected cleanup technologies that could have been on sight only days after the spill?
Well, as my school teachers taught me long ago, repitition is what causes us to learn best. By the time the next Climate Change Summit meeting comes around, the mind control media will have etched the oil spill propaganda into the minds of all the Americans, who will then call upon the White House and the global community to impose Carbon Taxes and clean air legislation for our “protection”!

Last year the House of Representatives passed a climate bill with a vote of 219 for, 212 against. Now Obama is hoping for a victory in the Senate. On May 12,Skull and Bonesman Senater John kerry, D-Mass., and Joe. Lieberman, I-Conn., introduced the 987 page “American Power Act” without their GOP colleague, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, whose support was considered crucial for its passage.

Senator Kerry wants us to believe this devestating bill will somehow help to bolster the economy and create jobs saying in a statement on the Kerry.Senate.gov site:
http://kerry.senate.gov/
The tragedy in the Gulf underscores why we need to change America’s energy future – today. We can’t afford to wait. Transitioning to new energy sources will jumpstart our economy, safeguard our national security, and protect our environment. We can reclaim our leadership of the global green economy, and stop sending a billion dollars a day overseas for our oil while we’re at it.

But according to Nicolas D. Loris http://www.sacbee.com/2010/06/11/2815398...er-of.html of The Heritage Foundation, this bill will “wreak economic havoc” and “kill jobs”. He also argues that the Kerry-Leiberman Bill will protect large corporations at the expense of consumers, with minimal effect on temperatures.
In the same article Nicolas stated:

The purpose of the bill is to drive energy prices high enough to reduce consumption. In effect, consumers would be forced to pay more for less energy. Higher energy costs would spread throughout the economy as producers try to cover their rising production costs by hiking their product prices.

Kerry-Lieberman attempts to shield the economic pain from consumers by passing two-thirds of the revenue it raises back to the consumer through energy discounts or direct rebates. Yet this clearly wouldn’t compensate for all of the rising costs that occur throughout the economy, thanks to higher energy prices.

Higher prices lower consumer demand, and the lower demand prevents higher prices from completely offsetting production cost increases. As a result, businesses must cut production, cut jobs – or both.

President Obama and his Politburo know that the American people are waking up to the “Global Warming/Climate Change” lie fostered by globalists such as Al Gore and Maurice Strong (among others), so now they must resort to more fear tactics and 9/11 “type” images of catastrophic demension in order to convince the public that carbon dioxide is a pollutant! (Tell that to the plants and see if they are convinced).

The globalists are getting nervous because, as Zbigniew Brzezsinski recently stated in a speech to his CFR cronies,
“for the first time, in all of human history, mankind is politically awakened. That’s a total new reality … it has not been so for most of human history until the last one hundred years … and in the course of the last one hundred years, the whole world has become politically awakened. And no matter where you go, politics is a matter of social engagement, and most people know what is generally going on..”

He also stated that because of a “diversified global leadership” and a “politically awakened” people globally, their plans for a world order are becoming far more difficult to establish.

The truth, however, about the comparisons being made between the attack on September 11, of 2001 and the Gulf Oil Spill of April 20, 2010 is simply this – both of their years have 2’s,0’s and 1’s in them – and that’s about their only similarities.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-14-2010, 06:17 PM
Post: #2
RE: Obama Compares Gulf Oil Spill To 9/11 Tragedy
is he tryin to be the president or somethin lol
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-18-2010, 01:27 AM
Post: #3
RE: Obama Compares Gulf Oil Spill To 9/11 Tragedy
BP Aware Of Cracks In Oil Well Two Months Before Explosion
[Image: 170610top2.jpg]

BP was aware of cracks appearing in the Macondo well as far back as February, right around the time Goldman Sachs and BP Chairman Tony Hayward were busy dumping their stocks in the company on the eve of the explosion that led to the oil spill, according to information uncovered by congressional investigators.

The Mining and Mineral Services agency released documents to Bloomberg indicating that BP “was trying to seal cracks in the well about 40 miles (64 kilometers) off the Louisiana coast,” according to the report. http://preview.bloomberg.com/news/2010-0...-show.html

The fissures, which BP began to attempt to fix on February 13, could have played a role in the disaster, though this is a question still being explored by investigators. Improperly sealed, the cracks cause explosive natural gas to rush up the shaft.

“The company attempted a “cement squeeze,” which involves pumping cement to seal the fissures, according to a well activity report. Over the following week the company made repeated attempts to plug cracks that were draining expensive drilling fluid, known as “mud,” into the surrounding rocks,” states the report.

[Image: 090610top.jpg]
As we previously highlighted, eyewitness evidence indicates that Deepwater Horizon managers knew that the BP oil rig had major problems before its explosion on April 20. A crew member who rescued burning workers on the rig told Houston attorney Tony Buzbee of a conversation between Deepwater Horizon installation manager Jimmy Harrell and someone in Houston. According to the witness, Harrell was screaming, “Are you fucking happy? Are you fucking happy? The rig’s on fire! I told you this was gonna happen.”
The fact that BP managers were aware of problems with the rig and were seemingly unconcerned about fixing them only lends more weight to the already startling indications of some having foreknowledge of the disaster.

As we highlighted last week, on page 37 of http://www.scribd.com/doc/32663286/Deepw...n-Briefing British Petroleum’s own investigative report into the oil spill, it is stated that the Hydraulic Control System on equipment designed to automatically seal the well in an emergency was modified without BP’s knowledge sometime before the explosion.

Highly suspicious stock and share trades by people connected to BP before the explosion indicate some extent of foreknowledge.

Goldman Sachs dumped 44% http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0602/month-o...-bp-stock/ of its shares in BP Oil during the first quarter of 2010 – shares that subsequently lost 36 percent of their value, equating to $96 million. The current chairman of Goldman Sachs is Bilderberg luminary Peter Sutherland, who is also the former chairman of British Petroleum.

Furthermore, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsb...spill.html as reported by the London Telegraph on June 5th, Tony Hayward, the current BP CEO sold £1.4 million of his shares in the fuel giant weeks before the spill.

On April 12th, just over one week before the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded, Halliburton, the world’s second largest oilfield services corporation, surprised some by acquiring Boots & Coots, a relatively small but vastly experienced oil well control company.

Halliburton is named in the majority of some two dozen lawsuits filed since the explosion by Gulf Coast people and businesses who claim that the company is to blame for the disaster.

Halliburton was forced to admit in testimony at a congressional hearing last month that it carried out a cementing operation 20 hours before the Gulf of Mexico rig went up in flames. The lawsuits claim that four Halliburton workers stationed on the rig improperly capped the well.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-08-2010, 09:06 AM
Post: #4
RE: Obama Compares Gulf Oil Spill To 9/11 Tragedy
(06-14-2010 05:47 PM)BrownDicky Wrote:  In an interview with Politico News outlet last Friday, President Obama stated:

“In the same way that our view of our vulnerabilities and our foreign policy was shaped profoundly by 9/11, I think this disaster is going to shape how we think about the environment and energy for many years to come.”

The truth, however, about the comparisons being made between the attack on September 11, of 2001 and the Gulf Oil Spill of April 20, 2010 is simply this – both of their years have 2’s,0’s and 1’s in them – and that’s about their only similarities.

I disagree. It's an analogy, not a direct comparison. Having hijacked jetliners destroying our skyscrapers at will was intolerable, so we acted to prevent it. By the same token, having an ocean and major wetlands area fouled with millions of gallons of oil that takes months to stop and decades to clean up is also intolerable. And if it isn't absolutely preventable, which it may not be, then major changes need to be considered for the future of deep-water offshore drilling and perhaps shallow-water too.

Add to that the global warming trend from burning fossil fuels, the political consequences of oil-dependence, and the finite nature of global oil reserves that will eventually run out anyway -- all of which are longer-term problems that haven't demanded our immediate attention -- and it can be argued that the immediate problem is a tipping-point for addressing all the connected problems we've been neglecting.
Sleepy
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: